ESP32 Vs ESP8266, What's the Difference?

ESP32 Vs ESP8266, What's the Difference?

The ESP32 and ESP8266 are both popular Wi-Fi-enabled microcontrollers developed by Espressif, but they differ significantly in terms of performance, features, and capabilities. Here are the key differences between the two:

1. Processor and Performance

  • ESP8266:
    • CPU: 32-bit Tensilica L106 microcontroller.
    • Clock Speed: Up to 80 MHz (some versions can run at 160 MHz).
    • Performance: It's sufficient for many basic IoT tasks but is relatively less powerful compared to the ESP32.
  • ESP32:
    • CPU: Dual-core 32-bit Tensilica LX6 microprocessor.
    • Clock Speed: Up to 240 MHz.
    • Performance: Much more powerful than the ESP8266, capable of handling more complex tasks and multitasking.

2. Connectivity

  • ESP8266:
    • Only supports Wi-Fi (802.11 b/g/n).
  • ESP32:
    • Supports Wi-Fi (802.11 b/g/n) like the ESP8266, but also adds support for Bluetooth Classic and Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE). This makes the ESP32 much more versatile in terms of connectivity options.

3. I/O Pins

  • ESP8266:
    • Typically has 17 GPIO pins, which may vary depending on the module.
    • Limited in terms of analog inputs and outputs (1 ADC input with 10-bit resolution).
  • ESP32:
    • Has a significantly larger number of GPIO pins (usually 34 pins), with more flexible I/O capabilities.
    • More ADC pins (typically 12-bit resolution), as well as DAC outputs.
    • Support for PWM, I2C, SPI, UART, CAN, and other communication protocols.

4. Power Consumption

  • ESP8266:
    • Generally has lower power consumption compared to the ESP32, especially in deep sleep mode.
  • ESP32:
    • Has more advanced power management capabilities, including multiple low-power modes (light sleep, deep sleep, etc.). However, it typically consumes more power than the ESP8266 under normal operation due to its higher processing power and more advanced features.

5. Memory

  • ESP8266:
    • RAM: Typically 50 KB of SRAM.
    • Flash Memory: Varies depending on the module, but typically around 512 KB to 4 MB.
  • ESP32:
    • RAM: 520 KB of SRAM.
    • Flash Memory: Supports larger flash memory sizes, often 4 MB or more, and is capable of external flash via SPI.

6. Analog and Digital Features

  • ESP8266:
    • Limited ADC (1 channel, 10-bit resolution).
    • No DAC or hardware PWM.
  • ESP32:
    • More advanced ADC (up to 18 channels, 12-bit resolution).
    • Includes DAC (digital-to-analog conversion) outputs.
    • Hardware support for PWM, I2S, and other digital protocols.

7. Development Ecosystem

  • Both the ESP8266 and ESP32 are supported by the Arduino IDE, ESP-IDF (Espressif IoT Development Framework), and other development platforms like PlatformIO. However, ESP32 is generally better supported in terms of advanced features and libraries due to its higher complexity and capability.

8. Price

  • ESP8266: Typically cheaper than the ESP32, which makes it a popular choice for simpler, cost-sensitive projects.

  • ESP32: Slightly more expensive due to its additional features, processing power, and Bluetooth capability, but still very affordable compared to other microcontrollers with similar features.

9. Use Cases

  • ESP8266: Best suited for simpler IoT projects where Wi-Fi connectivity is required but without the need for high performance or complex interfaces (e.g., smart home devices, simple sensors, basic web servers).

  • ESP32: Ideal for more demanding projects that require more processing power, multi-tasking, or advanced connectivity (e.g., Bluetooth-enabled devices, sensor hubs, audio applications, more complex IoT devices, and robotics).

Summary of Key Differences:

Feature ESP8266 ESP32
Processor Single-core, 80 MHz Dual-core, up to 240 MHz
Connectivity Wi-Fi only Wi-Fi, Bluetooth (Classic & BLE)
GPIO Pins 17 pins 34 pins
Analog Input 1 ADC, 10-bit resolution Multiple ADCs, 12-bit resolution, DAC
Memory 50 KB SRAM, 512 KB - 4 MB flash 520 KB SRAM, 4 MB flash (or more)
Power Consumption Lower in deep sleep More power-efficient modes but higher overall consumption
Price Lower cost Slightly higher cost

Conclusion:

  • If you need a simple, cost-effective Wi-Fi solution for basic IoT applications, ESP8266 is a great choice.
  • If you need more processing power, multiple connectivity options (Wi-Fi + Bluetooth), and advanced features like more GPIO pins, ADCs, and DACs, then ESP32 is the better choice.

In short, the ESP32 is a more feature-rich and versatile device, while the ESP8266 remains a great option for simpler applications.

Back to blog